Head to head
Bakersfield, CA vs Fresno, CA
Bakersfield is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $0/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $0 less in annual salary (taxes included).
| Metric | Bakersfield61 | Fresno57 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $3,836 | $3,836 |
| Salary for comfort | $71,000/yr | $71,000/yr |
| Typical rent | $1,500 | $1,470 |
| Median home value | $390,000 | $380,000 |
| Median household income | $69,000 | $62,000 |
| Unemployment | 7.5% | 6.5% |
| Housing score | 43 | 28 |
| Jobs score | 23 | 19 |
| Safety score | 73 | 57 |
| Climate score | 90 | 88 |
| Amenities score | 26 | 44 |
| Population | 417K | 545K |
| Summer high / winter low | 97° / 39° | 98° / 39° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Bakersfield, CA
Fresno, CA