Head to head
Spokane, WA vs Stockton, CA
Spokane is cheaper — estimated essentials for a single person run about $446/mo less, and living comfortably there takes roughly $13,500 less in annual salary (taxes included).
| Metric | Spokane55 | Stockton48 |
|---|---|---|
| Est. monthly cost (single) | $3,644 | $4,090 |
| Salary for comfort | $63,000/yr | $76,500/yr |
| Typical rent | $1,310 | $1,680 |
| Median home value | $380,000 | $470,000 |
| Median household income | $62,000 | $73,000 |
| Unemployment | 4.6% | 6.5% |
| Housing score | 40 | 29 |
| Jobs score | 27 | 29 |
| Safety score | 33 | 22 |
| Climate score | 86 | 96 |
| Amenities score | 38 | 20 |
| Population | 230K | 321K |
| Summer high / winter low | 84° / 25° | 94° / 39° |
Fit scores use the reference profile (single, $6,700/mo gross, default weights). Green marks the better value per row.
Spokane, WA
Stockton, CA